Comments on: Gendarme MSBuild task http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/ Sat, 19 May 2012 07:25:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Arun Mariappan K http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-85 Arun Mariappan K Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:48:09 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-85 Many Thanks for this Integration. I Like it and am looking for it... Many Thanks for this Integration. I Like it and am looking for it…

]]> By: Nick http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-79 Nick Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:01:37 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-79 @Paul Apologies for the delay in the response, for some reason I wasn't getting notified of any comments. Gendarme doesn't emit line numbers for all warnings, so some are against a class or even a project rather than against a particular line. I'm not sure why you need to comment out the exit code - which version of Gendarme are you using? I haven't had this experience myself with v2.6 or 2.8, but if you could provide any additional details (in particular, which exit code it's emitting) I'd be happy to look further into it. @Paul Apologies for the delay in the response, for some reason I wasn’t getting notified of any comments.

Gendarme doesn’t emit line numbers for all warnings, so some are against a class or even a project rather than against a particular line.

I’m not sure why you need to comment out the exit code - which version of Gendarme are you using? I haven’t had this experience myself with v2.6 or 2.8, but if you could provide any additional details (in particular, which exit code it’s emitting) I’d be happy to look further into it.

]]> By: Paul http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-78 Paul Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:19:49 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-78 Actually forget that last paragraph, looks like it doesn't jump to the correct line number in Visual Studio 2005, in Visual Studio 2008 it works correctly. Actually forget that last paragraph, looks like it doesn’t jump to the correct line number in Visual Studio 2005, in Visual Studio 2008 it works correctly.

]]> By: Paul http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-77 Paul Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:54:48 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-77 Nick, nice work. However, It's not quite working for me without a re-jig of the Execute() method. I'm getting a Process ExitCode of 0, so the CreateVisualStudioOutput() method is not called, even though Gendarme is creating an output XML file correctly in the location I specify. If I comment-out the if (exitCode != 0) then it works fine (although I'm not ruling out other possible side-effects of removing this check :) Also, with the output in the Warnings panel in VS, when I double-click an issue, it jumps to the correct file, but not to the correct line within the file even though the line number is present. Is this a limitation of Gendarme's output? Nick, nice work.

However, It’s not quite working for me without a re-jig of the Execute() method. I’m getting a Process ExitCode of 0, so the CreateVisualStudioOutput() method is not called, even though Gendarme is creating an output XML file correctly in the location I specify. If I comment-out the if (exitCode != 0) then it works fine (although I’m not ruling out other possible side-effects of removing this check :)

Also, with the output in the Warnings panel in VS, when I double-click an issue, it jumps to the correct file, but not to the correct line within the file even though the line number is present. Is this a limitation of Gendarme’s output?

]]> By: Lex Li http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-73 Lex Li Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:08:33 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-73 Hi Nick, thanks for the update. Love it. Hi Nick, thanks for the update. Love it.

]]> By: Nick http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-72 Nick Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:40:06 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-72 @Lex Li: I updated the task as per your feedback (it sounds like a good idea for the task to behave as FxCop does - I hadn't actually tried running it myself.) The task defaults to logging defects as warnings (not errors), and there's a new WarningsAsErrors property that allows you to switch that. Thanks for the comments. @Lex Li: I updated the task as per your feedback (it sounds like a good idea for the task to behave as FxCop does - I hadn’t actually tried running it myself.)

The task defaults to logging defects as warnings (not errors), and there’s a new WarningsAsErrors property that allows you to switch that.

Thanks for the comments.

]]> By: Nick http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-71 Nick Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:56:08 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-71 @Lex Li: no worries, the naming is perhaps not clear enough... @Lex Li: no worries, the naming is perhaps not clear enough…

]]> By: Lex Li http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-70 Lex Li Sun, 03 Oct 2010 01:48:59 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-70 Never mind. I just found DefectsCauseFailure="False". Never mind. I just found DefectsCauseFailure=”False”.

]]> By: Lex Li http://unintelligible.org/blog/2010/10/02/gendarme-msbuild-task/#comment-69 Lex Li Sun, 03 Oct 2010 01:42:46 +0000 http://unintelligible.org/blog/?p=203#comment-69 I really like this integration, as it also works for SharpDevelop. However, it is inconvenient to have violations listed as Error. It should be by default displayed as Warnings, similar to FxCop. Can you change that? I really like this integration, as it also works for SharpDevelop. However, it is inconvenient to have violations listed as Error. It should be by default displayed as Warnings, similar to FxCop. Can you change that?

]]>